Firstly, it claims that Helix tried to “outsmart” the attacker last week so, in response, the attacker “made a leak to torrentfreak that destroyed there business. Interestingly the brief chat with the hacker also revealed two further pieces of information. #Iptv by hacker download“I have no idea if it’s the same person, I have no idea if they actually were able to use the info in the store site to get into the and download it, I will say that it would be possible though.” “They are now demanding 10BTC from me 70K lol,” PrimeStreams’ operator wrote. Claiming that he/she was the same person that had targeted Helix last week, the person demanded that PrimeStreams should either shut down or pay a significant ransom. Nevertheless, the attacker wanted to make PrimeStreams pay. “100% my fault and I accept 100% responsibility,” he wrote. #Iptv by hacker fullKnowing that the information would probably leak out anyway, he took full responsibility for the breach. PrimeStreams’ operator did the responsible thing and didn’t attempt to hide anything from his customers. “The bad news for yourselves is that this mistake is going to cost you,” the person replied.ĭetailing internal information about how many subscribers’ the service has on the books, including around 121,000 with active subscriptions, the attacker went on to state that the business had a responsibility to protect its customers “and this is a responsibility you have failed.” #Iptv by hacker freeThe operator of PrimeStreams was polite in response, thanked the hacker for the heads-up, and offered a free account for advising the vulnerability. #Iptv by hacker password“Well you have changed the password so it is obvious you have ready my ticket ,” a communication from the hacker read, according to a screenshot of the discussion. The attacker exploited a password on the service’s billing panel and then advised the service through its own ticketing system what had happened. Last evening the operator of IPTV service PrimeStreams made an announcement to its customers that it too had suffered a hack, albeit not a very complex one. Nevertheless, just a week later, a second IPTV service has found itself in a similar position and has cast some additional light on the earlier attack against Helix. Initial reports suggested that Helix refused to pay but precisely what went on behind the scenes was hard to confirm. Knowing that the information would probably be leaked anyway, he took full responsibility for the intrusion, although he is not known to have paid any such extortion.Just one week ago, customers and resellers of ‘pirate’ IPTV service Helix Hosting were handed bad news via the service’s homepage.Ī message, placed there by a hacker, warned that Helix had been hacked and its operator had been given the option to either pay a ransom or face the personal details of his subscribers being leaked out onto the Internet. The PrimeStreams operator acted responsibly and did not try to hide anything from its customers. This extortion attempt included a $70,000 ransom demand in Bitcoins, 10 BTC by then. The attacker exploited a password in the service’s billing panel and then informed the service through its own ticketing system about what had happened. PrimeStreams customers were immediately informed to avoid major disasters, especially with the possession of payment data by this hacker. In late 2019, the IPTV provider found itself extorted by a hacker who claimed to have obtained the details of around 121,000 of its subscribers. This legal problem of PrimeStreams is not the first big incident that takes place in their career as operators of a pirate IPTV. Determining an exact figure for damages is impossible at this stage given the available information, but by combining the alleged FCA and DMCA violations, they could easily be tens of millions of dollars. “PrimeStreams was advertised as a subscription streaming service that provides over 3,000 channels, movies on demand, pay-per-view events and sports programming, among other content, all for one low monthly fee.”įor all this, DISH has asked the defendants for compensation that could be historic. The service was marketed and sold to users through these domains and through promotion on social media platforms. The service operated on various domains, including, and primehosting.one. “Defendants provide an unlawful streaming service known as PrimeStreams that allows users to access, without authorization, Internet communications of plaintiffs’ television programming that were acquired by circumventing security measures implemented by plaintiffs,” it reads.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |